Isn’t it funny that more protestors were arrested at the Republican convention in Minnesota than the Democrat convention in Colorado?
It was the Democrat anti-war protesters causing a ruckus in Minnesota this week and last week in Colorado it was the Democrat anti-war protesters that…hey, wait a minute. The same people were the biggest protesters at BOTH conventions.
Hmmm, so the Republicans left the Democrats alone to have their convention but the Democrats couldn’t return the favor. Which party was the mean one again?
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0446401720080905
http://cbs4denver.com/politics/saint.paul.denver.2.810733.html
Showing posts with label colorado. Show all posts
Showing posts with label colorado. Show all posts
Friday, September 5, 2008
Friday, August 1, 2008
Obama's very own SS?
Obama’s very own KGB, Republican Guard, SS? This is a scary thought. I'm a tad hesitant to make reference to Hitler's SS troops until I have more clarification on what Obama means by his term “Civilian National Security Force”.
In a recent speech in Colorado Obama said "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
Really? Just as well-funded as the Military’s $439B budget? Where’s this money going to come from? What will be the scope of this new National Security Force? What are they going to do that the CIA, FBI, NSA and Homeland security can’t do? Do we really need yet another national law enforcement agency?
Benito Mussolini created the OVRA (Organization for Vigilance and Repression of Anti-Fascism) in the aftermath of an assassination attempt on his life. The OVRA’s job was to support the state while keeping power in his own hands and preventing rivals from emerging. It’d be nice to get some clarification as to what Obama's intentions are for this new “Security Force”.
His quote is mysteriously missing from the official transcript of the speech but can be found at the YouTube link below showing the actual speech. There are two related links to the quote below as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEhzvyblUy4
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=69601
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2008/07/obama-calls-for-national-police-force.html
In a recent speech in Colorado Obama said "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
Really? Just as well-funded as the Military’s $439B budget? Where’s this money going to come from? What will be the scope of this new National Security Force? What are they going to do that the CIA, FBI, NSA and Homeland security can’t do? Do we really need yet another national law enforcement agency?
Benito Mussolini created the OVRA (Organization for Vigilance and Repression of Anti-Fascism) in the aftermath of an assassination attempt on his life. The OVRA’s job was to support the state while keeping power in his own hands and preventing rivals from emerging. It’d be nice to get some clarification as to what Obama's intentions are for this new “Security Force”.
His quote is mysteriously missing from the official transcript of the speech but can be found at the YouTube link below showing the actual speech. There are two related links to the quote below as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEhzvyblUy4
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=69601
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2008/07/obama-calls-for-national-police-force.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)